There appears to be a coordinated campaign by global elites to establish a new world order, largely by using technological advancements to develop an international, universal form of centralized governance. The G20 summit promotes international digital vaccine passports for future pandemics.
Global leaders are supporting the establishment of an internationally acknowledged digital vaccine passport system to “facilitate seamless” travel during “future pandemics” as another stride toward the development of a new global order at this year’s G20 Summit.
“We acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (International Health Regulations, 2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations,” reads the G20 Bali Leaders’ Declaration released yesterday.
“We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates,” the declaration adds.
The G20 leaders, which included Canada’s Justin Trudeau, America’s Joe Biden, China’s Xi Jinping, the United Kingdom’s Rishi Sunak, and more than a dozen others, explain how “the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the transformation of the digital ecosystem and digital economy,” and how they “recognize the importance of digital transformation in reaching the SDGs (United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals).”
The so-called G20 proclamation appears to be an extension of the suggestions made at the B20 earlier this week, the G20’s more business-focused equivalent.
Budi Sadikin, the Indonesian health minister, described the operation of this proposed worldwide system in a now-viral video from the B20 Summit.
There appears to be a coordinated campaign by global elites to establish a new world order, largely by using technological advancements to develop an international, universal form of centralized governance, whether it be through the G20, the B20, the UN’s SDGs, or the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” agenda.
In fact, a number of these leaders, including Trudeau, have connections to all the aforementioned organizations and efforts, and many of these organizations and initiatives use similar language and policy recommendations.
For instance, whereas the latest G20 declaration asserts that “the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the transformation of the digital ecosystem and digital economy,” the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” declaration also states that “The Covid-19 crisis, and the political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making.”
Even Trudeau has used similar language, saying, “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change.”
When it comes to policy proposals, almost all the organizations and initiatives concentrate on digitization initiatives, such as central bank digital currencies, digital identification, and digital health information, so-called climate change goals, which frequently involve the use of abortion and contraception as a method of population control, and a restructuring of the capitalist system.
The WEF’s “Great Reset,” in particular, lists “LGBTI Inclusion” as a key issue and many of the projects and groups work to destroy the conventional Christian family structure under the pretense of “equality.”
One former banking analyst explained to the media that the ultimate aim of these international initiatives, especially in the financial sector, is a top-down, hyper-centralized method of operation that is precisely the “opposite of the Catholic principle of subsidiarity,” which states that “a community of a higher order should not interfere in the internal life and community of a lower order.”